A randomized comparison of the i‐gel™ with the self‐pressurized air‐Q™ intubating laryngeal airway in children

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1460-9592|25|4|405-412

ISSN： 1155-5645

Source： PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Vol.25, Iss.4, 2015-04, pp. : 405-412

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Evaluation of glottic view through Air‐Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in the supine and lateral position and assessing it as a conduit for blind endotracheal intubation in children in the supine position

By  

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Vol. 25, Iss. 12, 2015-12 ,pp. : 1241-1247

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparison of fibreoptic‐guided tracheal intubation through the Ambu®Aura‐i™, the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the i‐gel™: a manikin study

By  

ANAESTHESIA, Vol. 70, Iss. 5, 2015-05 ,pp. : 591-597

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of air‐Q and Ambu Aura‐i for controlled ventilation in infants: a randomized controlled trial

By  

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Vol. 25, Iss. 8, 2015-08 ,pp. : 795-800

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparison of the i‐gel™ and the PRO‐Breathe® laryngeal mask during pressure support ventilation in children

By  

ANAESTHESIA, Vol. 70, Iss. 12, 2015-12 ,pp. : 1412-1417

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Fibreoptic intubation through Cookgas intubating laryngeal airway in two children

By  

ANAESTHESIA, Vol. 64, Iss. 10, 2009-10 ,pp. : 1148-1149

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite