Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-1825|36|2|150-151
ISSN: 0140-525x
Source: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.36, Iss.2, 2013-03, pp. : 150-151
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Attention is drawn to the distinction between the actual (or factual) and the apparent (or ostensible) causal history of a work of art, and how the authors' recommendation “to assume the design stance” in the name of understanding works of art blurs that distinction, thus inadvertently reinforcing the hoary idea, against which the authors otherwise rightly battle, that what one needs to properly appreciate an artwork can be found in even suitably framed observation of the work alone.
Related content
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 1990-12 ,pp. :
Representations of apparent rotation
By McNamara Timothy Diwadkar Vaibhav Blevins William Valiquette Christine
Visual Cognition, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 2006-02 ,pp. :