Related content

Two cases illustrating a potential difference between transobturator and retropubic slings

By Mukai Moses   Aboujaoude Ramzi   Culligan Patrick  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 18, Iss. 8, 2007-08 ,pp. : 967-969

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Patient satisfaction after retropubic and transobturator slings: first assessment using the Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire (IOQ)

By Betschart Cornelia   Scheiner David   Hess Eva   Seifert Burkhardt   Fink Daniel   Perucchini Daniele  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 7, 2011-07 ,pp. : 805-812

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings: a decision analysis to compare outcomes including efficacy and complications

By Shepherd Jonathan   Lowder Jerry   Jones Keisha   Smith Kenneth  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 21, Iss. 7, 2010-07 ,pp. : 787-793

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Carcinoma in a urethral diverticulum: magnetic resonance imaging and sonographic appearance

By Hickey N.   Murphy J.   Herschorn S.  

Urology, Vol. 55, Iss. 4, 2000-04 ,pp. : 588-589

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tension-free vaginal tape, Burch, and slings: are there predictors for early postoperative voiding dysfunction?

By Minassian Vatche   Al-Badr Ahmed   Drutz Harold   Lovatsis Danny  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, 2004-06 ,pp. : 183-187

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite