Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|5|2|241-241

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.5, Iss.2, 1982-06, pp. : 241-241

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 196-196

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reform peer review: The Peters and Ceci study in the context of other current studies of scientific evaluation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 221-225

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Deception in the study of the peer-review process

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 210-211

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 225-226

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Peer-review research: Objections and obligations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 246-255

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite