Chapter
A Bridge over troubled Waters: The Development of Medical Malpractice Litigation in Brazil
I. The Brazilian Legal System
II. The Structure of the Brazilian Legal System
III. The influence of the Consumer’s Defense Code
A. Informed Consent, the Duty to Inform, and Informed Choice
B. Moral Damages and the Inversion of the Burden of Proof As Patient’s Basic Rights
IV. The Changes Brought by the New Civil Code
Canadian Medical Malpractice Law in 2011: Missing the Mark on Patient Safety
I. The Canadian Malpractice Context
rvice Delivery, Regulation and Liability Insurance
II. State and Quality of the Canadian Health Care System
A. Medical Malpractice in the Domain of Privately Financed Care
III. Redressing Adverse Events through the Courts
A. Canadian Medical Malpractice Liability in Context
B. Empirical Trends on Medical Liability Claims
C. Black Letter of Canadian Tort Law
2. Negligence by Physicians
6. Ongoing Issues and Avenues of Reform
IV. Preventing Adverse Events: Professional and System Reform
A. Reforms at the Level of the Professions
1. Alternative Complaint Mechanisms
2. Revalidation/Recertification
1. Accreditation of Facilities
2. Canadian Patient Safety Institute
3. Improved Information Gathering and Dissemination
Yangge Dance: the Rhythm of Liability for Medical Malpractice in the People’s Republic of China
I. The Wider Healthcare Context
II. The Early P.R. China: Medical Services as Social Welfare (1949–1987)
III. The Administrative Liability Regime
A. The Medical Accident Rules 1987
2. Main Features of the Administrative Liability Regime, 1987–2002
B. The Medical Accident Regulations 2002
2. Main Features of the Administrative Liability Regime, 2002 onwards
IV. The Tort Liability Regime
A. Recourse to the General Principles of Civil Liability
B. Elements of the Tort Liability Regime
3. The Identification Process
C. Effect on the Administrative Liability Regime
V. Reform of Medical Liability under the Tort Liability Law of 2009
1. Increasing Disputes between Doctors and Patients
2. Concerns about Defensive Medical Treatments
3. The Chaos Resulting from the Dual Dystem of Medical Liability
C. Four Dimensions of the TLL
1. Basis of the Cause of Action
3. The Identification Procedure
VI. Another Step Backwards on Its Way?
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in France
Part I: The French Rules of Medical Liability since the Patients’ Rights Law of March 4, 2002
I. General Conditions of Medical Liability
A. Facts Likely to Justify the Physician’s Responsibility
1. Liability Based on Fault
II. Administration and Adjudication of claims based on liability rules
A. Adjudication Through Conciliation Commissions
B. Adjudication Through Courts
Part II: Compensation Based on National Solidarity
I. Typology of Cases Covered by National Solidarity
B. Hospital-Acquired Infections
C. Blood Transfusions Infections
II. Administration and Adjudication of Claims Based on National Solidarity
B. Procedural Routes to ONIAM
C. Adjudication Proceedings in Front of ONIAM
D. Regulatory Principles Applying to Rights of Recourse
III. Awarded Compensation
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Germany
I. The Potential Legal Consequences of Medical Injury
B. Professional and Disciplinary Sanctions
C. Fault-Based Compensation in Private Law
D. Strict Liability and No-Fault Compensation for Medical Product Injury
E. Social Security, Insurance, and Subrogation Issues
II. The System of Private Law Compensation
A. Treatment Malpractice Claims
B. Disclosure Malpractice Claims
2. Standard of Disclosure
C. Damages and Liability Insurance Issues
D. The Medical Arbitration Boards
III. Assessment of the Current Situation
B. Evaluation of the Private Law Redress Rules
C. Patient Safety Initiatives
Medical Malpractice: The Italian Experience
I. The Problematic Nature of Medical Liability
II. The Assignment of the Burden of Proof Between Parties
B. Proving Causation-In-Fact
C. Proving Causation Under the Criminal Law and Under the Civil Law
D. The Role of Informed Consent
The Law of Medical Misadventure in Japan
I. Prosecutions and Their Consequences
A. Prosecutions in Medical Cases
B. Response by the Health Ministry and the Medical Profession
C. One Prosecution Too Many: The Medical Professionals’ Counterattack and the String of Acquittals
A. Substantive Law of Medical Malpractice
4. Informed Consent and Related Actions
B. Key Aspects of Procedural Law and Practice
2. Discovery of Peer Review Findings
3. Judicial Administration Reforms
4. Settlement Practices, Overall Claiming Levels, and Malpractice Insurance Premiums
5. Plaintiffs’ Attorney Fees and Court Filing Fees
III. The No-Fault Compensation System for Obstetrical Injury
Treatment Injury in New Zealand
I. The New Zealand Accident Compensation Scheme
D. Relationship with the Common Law
3. Residual Actions for Damages
b. Modification of Ordinary Rules?
2. Nature of Treatment Injury
3. Treatment Injury in Operation
C. Professional Accountability
1. Reporting of Medical Risks
c. Pregnancy and Unwanted Births
d. Informed Consent Cases
A. Adequate Compensation?
B. Defensible Boundaries?
C. Administratively Efficient?
D. Disincentive to Safety-Conscious Behavior?
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Poland
I. Grounds for Civil Liability
II. Liability Based on Fault
III. Burden of Proof and Causation
V. Professional Liability of Doctors
Malpractice in Scandinavia
I. The Overall Scheme for Preventing and Redressing Medical Errors and Adverse Events
A. Regulatory Methods in the Nordic Health Care Systems
D. The Relationship Between the Systems
II. The Details of the Applicable Liability and Compensation Systems
A. Patient Injury Compensation Systems
2. Basis for Compensation
a. The Experienced Specialist Standard
b. The Failure of Apparatus
c. The Alternative Treatment Rule
d. The Reasonableness Rule
a. The Concept of Causation in Scandinavian Law
b. The Problems of Causation in Malpractice Law
c. Relaxation of Evidence
III. Available Empirical Data
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in South Africa
I. The Overall Scheme for Preventing and Redressing Medical Errors and Adverse Events, Including Regulation, Criminal and Civil Liability, and Social and Private Insurance, and the Relationships Among These Various Systems
1. Government Licensing Authorities for Doctors and Hospitals
2. Medico-Ethical Codes of Conduct
3. Reporting of Medical Errors and Adverse Events to the Health Profession Council of South Africa
4. Relationship Between the Liability Systems
1. Sufficient Insurance Cover To Be Required for Private Health Establishments
2. Private Indemnity (Medical Protection Society)
D. Relationships Among the Compensation Systems, the Liability Systems, and the Regulatory Systems
II. The Details of the Applicable Liability and Compensation Systems
A. Criteria Defining Qualification for Compensation
1. Liability Based on Fault
2. The Role of the South African Constitution, 1996
3. Nature of Damages and Compensation
B. Causation and “Loss of Chance”
1. General Rules on Causation
C. Liability for Failure to Obtain Informed Consent
D. Matters of Proof and Gathering of Evidence
III. Available Empirical Data on Medical Errors and Adverse Events, the Operation of the Systems Designed to Prevent and/or Redress such Errors and Events, and the Prevalence and Impact of Measures Designed to Reduce Medical Errors and Adverse Events, Improve System Performance, or Reduce System Costs
IV. Attitudes and Concerns About the Liability and Compensation Systems
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in the UK
I. The Context of Medical Malpractice Liability
II. Recent Empirical Evidence on the Numbers and Funding of Claims
III. NHS Redress Act 2006
IV. Patients’ Rights Bill in Scotland: The No-Fault Compensation Review Group Report (McLean Report)
V. Basis of Liability for Medical Injury
A. Contract, Tort, and Delict
B. The Requirements of Negligence
1. Difficulties in Proving Causation in Clinical Negligence Cases
5. Material Increase in Risk
7. Reinstating McGhee: Fairchild
8. The Scope of Fairchild and Clinical Negligence Cases
VI. Reforming the Costs of Civil Litigation in England and Wales: Implications of the Jackson Report for the Costs of Clinical Negligence and the Ministry of Justice Reform of Legal Aid
B. Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Global Perspective: How Does the U.S. Do It?
I. Details of the Applicable Regulatory and Liability/Compensation Systems
A. Regulating the Delivery of Medical Care
B. Liability/Compensation Systems
1. Fault-Based (Negligence)
2. No-Fault Liability (Strict Liability)
C. Limitations on Liability/Contracting out of Liability
D. Immunity from Liability
II. Empirical Data on Medical Errors/Adverse Events and Malpractice Litigation
A. How Common Are Medical Errors and Adverse Events?
B. Malpractice Litigation
1. Claiming Frequency (relative to rate of medical error/adverse events)
2. Compensation Patterns and Time Trends
3. Impact of Caps on Non-Economic Damages
4. Accuracy of the Liability System
6. Cost of Medical Errors/Adverse Events
7. Cost of the Liability System
III. Attitudes and Concerns About the Liability and Compensation Systems
IV. Why Do Things Look the Way They Do?
V. What Have We Learned by Studying Texas?
A. Who Decides Malpractice Cases?
B. Does it Matter How Much the Jury Awards in a Malpractice Case?
C. How Much Coverage Do Physicians Have?
D. Do Changes in the Tort System (i.e., increases in the number of claims, or payouts per claim) Help Explain the Malpractice Crises that Hit the United States in 2000–2003?
E. Impact of Tort Reforms on Claim Frequency and Payouts
Medical Malpractice and Compensation: Comparative Observations
I. Making Sense of Diversity
A. A Diversity of Legal Mechanisms
2. Alternative compensation systems
3. Other regulatory and complaints mechanisms
1. The substantive legal context
2. The wider litigation process
3. The health care context
C. Comparative Functional Analysis
II. Assessment of Liability-Based Approaches
1. Mechanisms for dealing with organizational complexity
2. Adaptation of the Requirements of Causation and Proof
3. Patients’ Rights and Disclosure Duties
1. The deterrent effect of liability rules
2. Pushing prevention too far? Defensive medicine and related issues
1. Public controversy and narratives of crisis
III. Assessment of No-Fault Alternatives
B. New Zealand: an exclusive no-fault regime
C. The Nordic Patient Insurance Schemes
D. France: Compensation on the Basis of National Solidarity
E. Comparison and Evaluation
Canadian Medical Malpractice Law in 2011: Missing the Mark on Patient Safety
Yangge Dance: the Rhythm of Liability for Medical Malpractice in the People’s Republic of China
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in France
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Germany
Medical Malpractice: The Italian Experience
The Law of Medical Misadventure in Japan
Treatment Injury in New Zealand
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Poland
Malpractice in Scandinavia
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in South Africa
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in the UK
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Global Perspective: How Does the U.S. Do It?
Medical Malpractice and Compensation: Comparative Observations