

Author: Lee S.
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
ISSN: 1521-7388
Source: Aerosol Science and Technology, Vol.40, Iss.3, 2006-03, pp. : 157-165
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Daily mass concentrations of PM 1.0 (particles less than 1.0 µm in diameter), PM 2.5 (particles less than 2.5 µm in diameter), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) were measured from January through May 2004 at a heavily trafficked sampling site in Hong Kong (PU). The average concentrations for PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 were 35.9 ± 12.4 µ g cm - 3 and 52.3 ± 18.3 µ g cm - 3 . Carbonaceous aerosols were the dominant species in fine particles, accounting for ~ 45.7% of PM 1.0 and ~ 44.4% of PM 2.5 . During the study period, seven fine-particle episodes occurred, due to the influence of long-range transport of air masses from mainland China. PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 responded in similar ways; i.e., with elevated mass and OC concentrations in those episode days. During the sampling period, PM 1.0 OC and EC generally behaved similarly to the carbonaceous aerosols in PM 2.5 , regardless of seasonal variations and influence by regional pollutions. The low and relatively constant OC/EC ratios in PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 indicated that vehicular emissions were major sources of carbonaceous aerosols. PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 had the same dominant sources of vehicular emissions in winter, while in spring PM 2.5 was more influenced by PM 1 - 2.5 (particles 1–2.5 µ m in diameter) that did not form from vehicle exhausts. Therefore, PM 1.0 was a better indicator for vehicular emissions at the Roadside Station.
Related content




PM 2.5 and PM 10 Mass Measurements in California's San Joaquin Valley
By Chow Judith
Aerosol Science and Technology, Vol. 40, Iss. 10, 2006-10 ,pp. :




By Heist D. K. Tolocka M. P. Vanderpool R. W. Peters T. M. Chen F.-L. Wiener R. W.
Aerosol Science and Technology, Vol. 34, Iss. 5, 2001-05 ,pp. :