Author： Prior M.
Publisher： White Horse Press
ISSN： 1752-7015
Source： Environmental Values, Vol.7, Iss.4, 1998-11, pp. : 423-441
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The origins of both economic and philosophical value theory are examined and shown to be closely related. The status of neo-classical value theory is that it is internally flawed in any attempt to describe the real world. Cost-benefit analysis as it applies to the valuation of environmental agents relies upon the claim that this neo-classical theory has a particular status in optimal welfare maximisation and, therefore, suffers the same problems of internal consistency. Economic valuation of the environment is not a scientific process derived from external law but a social process relying upon social agreement. Alternatives to economic valuation are considered and may possess a more plausible social base. However, all environmental valuation is at odds with beliefs based upon the existence of objective and intrinsic values.
Related content
Plural Values and Environmental Valuation
By Beckerman Wilfred Pasek Joanna
Environmental Values, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 1997-02 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Environmental valuation and the economic level of leakage
Urban Water, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, 2001-12 ,pp. :
By Crookes Douglas de Wit Martin
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 2002-06 ,pp. :