![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Author: Roper D.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0014-0856
Source: Essays in Criticism, Vol.52, Iss.3, 2002-07, pp. : 222-234
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
T.S. Eliot and the textualities of the discarded
Textual Practice, Vol. 28, Iss. 6, 2014-09 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Modernism, T.S. Eliot, and the ‘age of worry’
Textual Practice, Vol. 26, Iss. 6, 2012-12 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Sensuous Intelligence: T. S. Eliot and Geoffrey Hill
By Day Thomas
The Cambridge Quarterly, Vol. 35, Iss. 3, 2006-01 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Discretion and Indiscretion in the Letters of T. S. Eliot
The Cambridge Quarterly, Vol. 39, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
T. S. Eliot and Racine: Tragedy and Resignation in Brnice
The Cambridge Quarterly, Vol. 36, Iss. 1, 2007-01 ,pp. :