Author： Campbell Alan McIlroy John McLoughlin Barry Halstead John
Publisher： Oxford University Press
ISSN： 0955-2359
Source： Twentieth Century British History, Vol.16, Iss.4, 2005-01, pp. : 471-488
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper is a response to the rejoinder by Gidon Cohen and Kevin Morgan to a critique of their article on British students at the International Lenin School (ILS) in Moscow which appeared in a recent issue of Twentieth Century British History. It develops the criticism of their data and research methods, and the revised results and conclusions they derive from them, while taking issue with their approach to historical argument. It demonstrates that the presence of ILS graduates in leading positions in the Communist Party of Great Britain and in the apparatus of the party did not, as they insist, disappear after 1943, but persisted into the 1950s.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
The International Lenin School: A Final Comment
Twentieth Century British History, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 2007-01 ,pp. :
The International Lenin School: A Response to Cohen and Morgan
Twentieth Century British History, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 2004-03 ,pp. :
Lenin's death in the British press
By Ward Chris
Rethinking History, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, 2006-12 ,pp. :