Addressing distance in the space syntax syntactical model

Author： Salheen M. Forsyth L. Correspondence

ISSN： 1468-4519

Source： Urban Design International, Vol.6, Iss.2, 2001-06, pp. : 93-110

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

This paper discusses pedestrian movement and the criteria pedestrians use when selecting a route. The source of the material was an investigation into the pedestrian environment in the city centre of Cairo. Resulting from this investigation the paper seeks to provide a model for pedestrian movement using the attributes suggested by Space Syntax and transportation planning literature. Both of these fields attempt to understand and predict pedestrian movement, but they diverge in their selection of the factors that have a major effect on route choice. Space Syntax uses the number of changes in direction as a key factor, whereas transport engineering focuses mainly on the criterion of distance. The paper reviews the main issues considered in both fields before examining the results from a questionnaire used in Cairo that asked pedestrians to identify their reasons for route choice. A graphic model (the Metric Axial Model) was developed based on the concept of axial lines (Hillier and Hanson, 1984) but including modifications to account for distance. The resultant model (MAM) requires further research to explore its validity and potential use. However, from the evidence presented, it appears to offer an empirical method to measure the variable of Universal Distance in movement related models. Universal Distance was first proposed by Hillier (1996), but to date has not been developed beyond the hypothetical simplified model that Hillier used in his proposal.