Why delay the obvious need for milder forms of ovarian stimulation?

By Edwards R G   Lobo R A   Bouchard P  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 1997-02 ,pp. : 399-401

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial

By Baart Esther B.   Martini Elena   Eijkemans Marinus J.   Van Opstal Diane   Beckers Nicole G.M.   Verhoeff Arie   Macklon Nicolas S.   Fauser Bart C.J.M.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2007-04 ,pp. : 980-988

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

DEBATE. The role of LH in ovarian stimulation Exogenous LH: let's design the future

By Lévy D.P.   Navarro J.M.   Schattman G.L.   Davis O.K.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2001-03 ,pp. : 598-598

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Debate. Future use of clomiphene in ovarian stimulation. Will clomiphene persist in the 21st century?

By Tarlatzis BC   Grimbizis G  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 13, Iss. 9, 1998-09 ,pp. : 2356-2358

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Infertility. Selection of good embryos for transfer depends on embryo cohort size: implications for the `mild ovarian stimulation' debate

By Devreker Fabienne  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, Iss. 12, 1999-12 ,pp. : 3002-3008

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite