Author： Woolf Raphael
Publisher： Brill
ISSN： 1568-5284
Source： Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol.54, Iss.1, 2009-01, pp. : 9-39
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
To what extent is possession of truth considered a good thing in the Republic? Certain passages of the dialogue appear to regard truth as a universal good, but others are more circumspect about its value, recommending that truth be withheld on occasion and falsehood disseminated. I seek to resolve this tension by distinguishing two kinds of truths, which I label 'philosophical' and 'non-philosophical'. Philosophical truths, I argue, are considered unqualifiedly good to possess, whereas non-philosophical truths are regarded as worth possessing only to the extent that possession conduces to good behaviour in those who possess them. In the non-philosophical arena it is an open question, to be determined on a case-by-case basis, whether falsehood is more efficacious in furthering this practical aim than truth.
Related content
Plato's Division of Goods in the Republic
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 47, Iss. 4, 2002-08 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
INDIVIDUAL AND POLIS IN PLATO'S REPUBLIC
By Cantu Gerald
Polis: The Journal of the Society for Greek Political Thought, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. :
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 6, Iss. 1-2, 1961-01 ,pp. :
Rhetoric, Drama and Truth in Plato's Symposium
International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, 2008-04 ,pp. :
Truth, truthfulness and philosophy in Plato and Nietzsche
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2007-05 ,pp. :