Author： Polo Vicente Larrosa José M. Pinilla Isabel Gonzalvo F. Perez S. Honrubia Francisco M.
Publisher： Humana Press, Inc
ISSN： 1530-4086
Source： Annals of Ophthalmology, Vol.34, Iss.4, 2002-12, pp. : 194-197
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The efficacy of short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) and conventional automated perimetry (CAP) in detecting the progression of glaucomatous visual field loss was compared. After 3 years, CAP detected progressive visual field damage in 3 (13.6%) of 22 eyes, while SWAP detected progressive visual field damage in 8 (36.6%) of 22 eyes. Thus, SWAP was more efficient than CAP in detecting progressive visual field losses in glaucomatous patients with incipient defects.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
Normal Values of Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry
Ophthalmologica, Vol. 217, Iss. 4, 2003-06 ,pp. :
By Polo V. Larrosa J. M. Pablo L. E. Fernandez F. J. Honrubia F. M.
Annals of Ophthalmology, Vol. 33, Iss. 3, 2001-09 ,pp. :