Major changes to the Code of Nomenclature—Melbourne, July 2011

By McNeill John   Turland Nicholas J.  

Taxon, Vol. 60, Iss. 5, 2011-10 ,pp. : 1495-1497

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Fungal nomenclature

By  

Mycotaxon, Vol. 113, Iss. 1, 2010-07 ,pp. : 503-514

Mycotaxon

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Synopsis of Proposals on Botanical Nomenclature – Melbourne 2011: A review of the proposals concerning the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature submitted to the XVIII International Botanical Congress

By McNeill John   Turland Nicholas  

Taxon, Vol. 60, Iss. 1, 2011-02 ,pp. : 243-286

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The foundation of the Melbourne Code Appendices: Announcing a new paradigm for tracking nomenclatural decisions

By  

Taxon, Vol. 64, Iss. 5, 2015-10 ,pp. : 1021-1027

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

(042–043) Proposal to modify Article 9 Note 1 and the Glossary of the Melbourne Code

By MatosFernando B.The New York Botanical Garden   2900 Southern Blvd.   Bronx   New York 10458-5126   U.S.A.;   Email: fmatos@nybg.org   PradoJeffersonInstituto de Botânica   Herbário   C.P. 68041   CEP 04045-972   São Paulo   SP   Brazil   MoranRobbin C.The New York Botanical Garden   2900 Southern Blvd.   Bronx   New York 10458-5126   U.S.A.  

Taxon, Vol. 64, Iss. 3, 2015-06 ,pp. : 649-649

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite