

Author: Bragg Don C.
Publisher: Society of American Foresters
ISSN: 0148-4419
Source: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol.32, Iss.1, 2008-02, pp. : 38-43
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Virtually all techniques for tree height determination follow one of two principles: similar triangles or the tangent method. Most people apply the latter approach, which uses the tangents of the angles to the top and bottom and a true horizontal distance to the subject tree. However, few adjust this method for ground slope, tree lean, crown shape, and crown configuration, making errors commonplace. Given documented discrepancies exceeding 30% with current methods, a reevaluation of height measurement is in order. The sine method is an alternative that measures a real point in the crown. Hence, it is not subject to the same assumptions as the similar triangle and tangent approaches. In addition, the sine method is insensitive to distance from tree or observer position and can not overestimate tree height. The advantages of the sine approach are shown with mature southern pines from Arkansas.
Related content




Improved Forage Under Southern Pines
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 52, Iss. 11, 1954-11 ,pp. :


Stain Technique for Rapid Diagnosis of Rust in Southern Pines
By Jewell F. F.
Forest Science, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 1958-03 ,pp. :


Influence of the Root System on Height Growth of Three Southern Pines
Forest Science, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 1967-09 ,pp. :


Tested Methods of Grafting Pines
By Mirov N. T.
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 38, Iss. 10, 1940-10 ,pp. :