Author: Crystal Abe
Publisher: Society for Technical Communication
ISSN: 0049-3155
Source: Technical Communication, Vol.54, Iss.1, 2007-02, pp. : 16-26
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This article presents three problems with existing information architecture frameworks. First, they are too focused on organizing information based on topic. Second, they treat facets as a supplemental form of classification. Third, they conflate the organization and representation of information. Analysis of these three problems suggests that information architects should provide navigation systems and user interfaces—based on an underlying framework of faceted classification—that allow users to flexibly navigate through complex information spaces in the service of particular tasks and goals. To this end, this article introduces a faceted classification framework, and provides an example of a model framework, called “Facets are Fundamental” (FaF). The purpose of the FaF framework is to explicitly designate faceted classification (rather than a hierarchical classification) as the starting point of the IA development process. Both of these approaches encourage information architects to employ non-topical methods for organizing and representing information.
Related content
By White Martin
The Electronic Library, Vol. 22, Iss. 3, 2004-03 ,pp. :
Cataloging our information architecture
By Fox Robert
OCLC Systems & Services, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, 2005-01 ,pp. :
Information architecture planning with XML
Library Hi Tech, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2001-09 ,pp. :
Information Architecture: Intercultural Human Factors
Technical Communication, Vol. 53, Iss. 2, 2006-05 ,pp. :