

Author: Holmes J.G. Miller D.T. Lerner M.J.
Publisher: Academic Press
ISSN: 0022-1031
Source: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.38, Iss.2, 2002-03, pp. : 144-151
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Two field studies tested the hypothesis that people's willingness to help a charitable organization is greater when the act is presented as an economic transaction than when it is presented as an act of charity. In Study 1 participants donated more money to a charity when offered a product in exchange for their donation, even though the product itself held little appeal for them. Participants' donation rates were also more responsive to the level of need of the victim group when they were offered a product in exchange for their donation, consistent with the idea that the exchange provided psychological cover for their act of compassion. In Study 2 participants' willingness to purchase a product from a charitable organization increased the more of a bargain the price was purported to be, but only when the victims' need was high. The source of people's desire to not reveal or even to recognize the full extent of their prosocial motivation is discussed, as are the implications of the exchange fiction for charity appeals.
Related content


Self-Interest, Science, and Cynicism
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 1985-03 ,pp. :


Evolved self-interest and the cross-cultural survey
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 1991-06 ,pp. :


Sociality versus self-interest in human evolution
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, 1989-12 ,pp. :




Hate, Self-Interest, and "Good-Enough" Relating: An Evolutionary-Adaptive Perspective
By Slavin M.O.
Psychoanalytic Inquiry, Vol. 20, Iss. 3, 2000-06 ,pp. :