No Evidence for Blocking in Human Judgments of Causality by Stimuli Presented during an Outcome Delay

Author： Reed P.  

Publisher： Academic Press

ISSN： 0023-9690

Source： Learning and Motivation, Vol.27, Iss.3, 1996-08, pp. : 317-333

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements

By Evan Livesey   Robert Boakes  

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B, Vol. 57, Iss. 4, 2004-10 ,pp. : 361-379

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Human Response Rates and Causality Judgments on Schedules of Reinforcement

By Reed P.  

Learning and Motivation, Vol. 32, Iss. 3, 2001-08 ,pp. : 332-348

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement

By Reed Phil  

Animal Learning & Behavior, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, 2003-05 ,pp. : 205-211

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements

By Glautier Steven  

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B, Vol. 55, Iss. 2, 2002-04 ,pp. : 121-135

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: Blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity

By Mitchell Chris J.   Lovibond Peter F.  

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B, Vol. 55, Iss. 4, 2002-10 ,pp. : 311-329

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite