A profile of recyclers making special trips to recycle

ISSN： 0301-4797

Source： Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.62, Iss.2, 2001-06, pp. : 201-220

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

The aims of the research were to: (1) establish a profile of ‘special recyclers’, i.e. those who make special trips by car to recycle their household waste; and (2) establish whether the environmental burden resulting from their activities presents a significant environmental problem than needs pro-active management. The research was undertaken through surveys of recyclers at supermarket recycling centres and at civic amenity sites in Glasgow and across Ayrshire in south-west Scotland. Twenty-two percent of civic amenity recyclers made special trips to recycle, whilst at supermarkets less than 10%made special journeys. Those making special journeys tended to make shorter journeys than those combining recycling with another activity. Special recyclers also tended, on average, to recycle more items and bring greater weights of recyclable material per trip. No demographic difference was found between the special recyclers and the ‘non-specials’. The environmental impact of consumer journeys to recycle was estimated from the statistic: ‘The total distance travelled by car by special recyclers/the total weight deposited by all recyclers’. For the sites of this survey, this statistic ranged in value from 9 km tonne^-1to 106 km tonne^-1. The lowest impacts of 9 km tonne^-1were at a supermarket site in a small town with a predominantly local catchment. The highest impacts were at a civic amenity site, in a major town, also used by residents from satellite communities. Over 50% of special recyclers cited nearness as their prime reason for choosing a particular site, compared with 32% of non-specials. Although special recyclers in Ayrshire did appear to act reasonably responsibly (environmentally), their activities produced additional environmental burden. Simulation studies demonstrate that up to 34% reduction in this burden may be possible through encouraging longer intervals between recycling trips. Three quarters of the environmental burden was attributable to less than 5% of the overall recycling population.