Volume 8, Number 4 (1999), in the article “Response Deadline and Subjective Awareness in Recognition Memory,” by Johh M. Gardiner, Cristina Ramponi, and Alan Richardson–Klavehn, pages 484–496 (doi:10.1006/ccog.1999.0409): On pages 490–491, in describing the results of Experiment 2, the authors state that out of a total of 3840 responses, only 355 (or 9%) fell outside the response deadlines. In fact, the total number of responses in Experiment 2 was 3200 and so the 355 responses represented 11%, not 9%, of the total. This error has no other implications. The authors are grateful to Peter Graf (personal communication, March 12, 2000) for pointing out the error.

Author：  

Publisher： Academic Press

ISSN： 1053-8100

Source： Consciousness and Cognition, Vol.9, Iss.2, 2000-06, pp. : 327-327

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Volume 9, Number 4 (2000), in the article “William James's The Fringe of Consciousness REM Mentation in Narcoleptics and Normals: Reply to Tore Nielsen,” by Roar Fosse, pages 514–515 (doi:10.1006/ccog.2000.0470): On page 514, the title is incorrect as printed. The title should read “REM Mentation in Narcoleptics and Normals: Reply to Tore Nielsen.” “William James's The Fringe of Consciousness” should be a heading following this article in the Table of Contents and pertains to the articles that follow. Both the Fosse reply and the heading are correct as printed in the Table of Contents in the print issue.

By  

Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 2001-03 ,pp. : 157-157

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Volume 10, Number 2 (2001), in the article “Invariant Reversible QEEG Effects of Anesthetics,” by E. R. John, L. S. Prichep, W. Kox, P. Valdés-Sosa, J. Bosch-Bayard, E. Aubert, M. Tom, F. diMichele, and L. D. Gugino, pages 165–183 (doi:10.1006/ccog.2001.0507)

By  

Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 2002-03 ,pp. : 138-138

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Volume 82, Number 2 (2000), in the article “Familiarity Bias and Belief Reversal in Relative Likelihood Judgment,” by Craig R. Fox and Jonathan Levav, pages 268–292 (obhd.2000.2898)

By  

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 86, Iss. 2, 2001-11 ,pp. : 322-322

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Volume 43, Number 1 (2001), in the article “The Development of Ordinal Numerical Competence in Young Children,” by Elizabeth M. Brannon and Gretchen A. Van de Walle, pages 53–81 (doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0756):

By  

Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 44, Iss. 2, 2002-03 ,pp. : 191-192

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Volume 80, Number 1 (1999), in Article No. obhd.1999.2854, “Collective Induction: Twelve Postulates,” by Patrick R. Laughlin, pages 50–69:

By  

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 81, Iss. 2, 2000-03 ,pp. : 359-359

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite