Interpreting score differences in the SF-36 Vitality scale: using clinical conditions and functional outcomes to define the minimally important difference

By Bjorner Jakob B.   Wallenstein Gene V.   Martin Marie C.   Lin Peggy   Blaisdell-Gross Bonnie   Tak Piech Catherine   Mody Samir H.  

Current Medical Research and Opinion, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, 2007-04 ,pp. : 731-739

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Values of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire in Individuals with Dementia

By  

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Vol. 63, Iss. 7, 2015-07 ,pp. : 1448-1452

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of the Sensitivity to Change of the 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey and the Lupus Quality of Life Measure Using Various Definitions of Minimum Clinically Important Differences in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

By  

ARTHRITIS CARE AND RESEARCH, Vol. 70, Iss. 1, 2018-01 ,pp. : 125-133

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

DEVELOPMENT OF A CLINICAL RATING SCALE FOR PERSONS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE

By  

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Vol. 47, Iss. 6, 1999-06 ,pp. : 763-764

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Clinical Value of the London Psychogeriatric Rating Scale

By  

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Vol. 26, Iss. 8, 1978-08 ,pp. : 348-354

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite