Chapter
2.4. A Critical Review of the Two Hypotheses
pp.:
34 – 37
3. Unaccusativity and Ergativity
pp.:
37 – 37
3.1. Introduction
pp.:
37 – 38
3.2. Ergativity in Accusative Languages
pp.:
38 – 40
3.3. Ergativity and Passive
pp.:
40 – 41
3.4. Syntactic Ergativity and Structural Case
pp.:
41 – 42
4.1. Unaccusativity and its Consequences
pp.:
42 – 44
4. Ergative Typology
pp.:
42 – 42
4.2. Dyirbal
pp.:
44 – 47
4.4. Properties of Georgian
pp.:
54 – 58
5. Conclusion
pp.:
58 – 59
II WORD-CLASSES IN INUIT
pp.:
59 – 59
1.1. General Remarks
pp.:
59 – 60
1. Introduction
pp.:
59 – 59
1.2. Lexical Categories
pp.:
60 – 61
2.1. Introduction
pp.:
61 – 63
2.2. Verb Classes
pp.:
63 – 68
2.3. Detransitivization and Transitivization
pp.:
68 – 77
2.4. Overview
pp.:
77 – 79
3.1. Introduction
pp.:
79 – 80
3.2. Nominalizations
pp.:
80 – 88
4. Adjectives
pp.:
88 – 92
5. Prepositions (Case-Morphology)
pp.:
92 – 100
6.1. Introduction
pp.:
100 – 100
6.2. The Lack of Adjectives
pp.:
100 – 102
6. Major Category Classification in Inuit
pp.:
100 – 100
6.3. Oblique Case-Morphology and Prepositions
pp.:
102 – 105
6.4. Conclusion
pp.:
105 – 106
7. Other Categories
pp.:
106 – 115
1. Introduction
pp.:
115 – 117
III X’-AFFIXES AND CO-GOVERNMENT
pp.:
115 – 115
2. Reanalysis Structures and Co-Analysis
pp.:
117 – 117
2.1. Introduction
pp.:
117 – 118
2.2. Co-Analysis and PRO
pp.:
118 – 121
3.1. Government and Co-Government
pp.:
121 – 124
3. Co-Government
pp.:
121 – 121
3.2. English Pseudo-Passives
pp.:
124 – 125
3.3. French Causatives
pp.:
125 – 130
3.4. Dutch Verb Raising
pp.:
130 – 134
4.1. Introduction
pp.:
134 – 135
4. Co-government and Adjacency
pp.:
134 – 134
4.2. Obligatory Adjacency
pp.:
135 – 143
4.3. Conclusion
pp.:
143 – 144
5.2. I and V in English and French
pp.:
144 – 145
5. Reanalysis Units as Thematic Complexes
pp.:
144 – 144
5.1. Introduction
pp.:
144 – 144
5.3. Thematic Complexes
pp.:
145 – 146
5.4. Governing Heads
pp.:
146 – 149
5.5. I and V in Dutch
pp.:
149 – 153
6.1. X’-Affixes and Reanalysis
pp.:
153 – 153
6. The Analysis of Inuit NPs
pp.:
153 – 153
5.2. Non-Oblique NPs (NIPs)
pp.:
153 – 156
6.3. Oblique NPs (PPs)
pp.:
156 – 161
1.1. Introductory Remarks
pp.:
161 – 161
1. Introduction
pp.:
161 – 161
1.2. CP in Inuit
pp.:
161 – 163
IV THE MORPHOLOGICAL ERGATIVITY OF INUIT
pp.:
161 – 161
2.1. Introduction
pp.:
163 – 163
1.3. The Argument Status of the Absolutive and the Ergative NP
pp.:
163 – 163
2.2. Word Order
pp.:
163 – 166
2. Arguments for Morphological Ergativity
pp.:
163 – 163
2.3. Manipulation of Arguments
pp.:
166 – 167
2.4. The Interaction of Reflexives, Passives and Antipassives
pp.:
167 – 171
2.5. The Dative-Shift Construction in Central Arctic
pp.:
171 – 174
2.6. Anaphoric Binding
pp.:
174 – 181
2.7. Noun Incorporation
pp.:
181 – 189
2.8. Verb Incorporation
pp.:
189 – 200
3. The Morphological Ergativity of Inuit
pp.:
200 – 200
3.1. Summary of the Arguments for Morphological Ergativity
pp.:
200 – 201
3.2. Structural Properties of Subjects and Objects
pp.:
201 – 203
3.3. On the Structure of Inuit Clauses
pp.:
203 – 209
1. Introduction
pp.:
209 – 212
V THE INUIT CASE SYSTEM
pp.:
209 – 209
2. Morphological Aspects of Inflection
pp.:
212 – 212
2.1. Introduction
pp.:
212 – 212
2.2. Mood Morphology
pp.:
212 – 214
2.3. Third Person Agreement
pp.:
214 – 215
2.4. First and Second Person Agreement
pp.:
215 – 219
2.5. Summary of Indicative Agreement-Morphology
pp.:
219 – 221
2.6. I and the Modules of Grammar
pp.:
221 – 222
3.1. Introduction
pp.:
222 – 222
3. Case-Assignment in Simplex Clauses
pp.:
222 – 222
3.2. Absolutive in Intransitive IPs
pp.:
222 – 223
3.3. Ergative
pp.:
223 – 226
3.4. Genitive in Gerundials
pp.:
226 – 229
3.5. The Case of the Direct Object
pp.:
229 – 238
3.7. Conclusion
pp.:
238 – 239
4.1. Introduction
pp.:
239 – 242
4. Case-assignment in Complex Clauses
pp.:
239 – 239
4.2. Subject Control
pp.:
242 – 243
4.3. Raising
pp.:
243 – 245
4.4. Object Control
pp.:
245 – 248
4.5. Causative/ECM
pp.:
248 – 252
4.6. Conclusions
pp.:
252 – 254
5.2. -niq and -vvik nominalizations
pp.:
254 – 258
5.1. Introduction
pp.:
254 – 254
5. Case-Assignment in Syntactic Nominalizations
pp.:
254 – 254
5.3. -suq and -saq Nominalizations
pp.:
258 – 267
VI ACCUSATIVE CASE IN INUIT
pp.:
267 – 267
1. Introduction
pp.:
267 – 268
2.1. Antipassive and Language Typology
pp.:
268 – 271
2. The Standard Analysis of the Antipassive
pp.:
268 – 268
2.2. Zubizarreta (1985)
pp.:
271 – 272
2.3. Causative/ECM Constructions
pp.:
272 – 273
3. Baker’s Noun-Incorporation Analysis of the Antipassive
pp.:
273 – 276
4. Modalis as Accusative Case
pp.:
276 – 276
4.1. Introduction
pp.:
276 – 277
4.2. Non-Oblique Modalis NPs
pp.:
277 – 279
4.3. The Antipassive as a Nominative-Accusative Construction
pp.:
279 – 280
4.4. Accusative and Burzio’s Generalization
pp.:
280 – 285
4.5. The Optionality of the Accusative NP
pp.:
285 – 287
4.6. Accusative NPs and Indefiniteness
pp.:
287 – 291
5. Antipassive Suffixes
pp.:
291 – 291
4.7. Conclusion
pp.:
291 – 291
5.1. Introduction
pp.:
291 – 292
5.2. Antipassive Suffixes as Auxiliaries
pp.:
292 – 298
6. Conclusion: The Dual Case-Pattern of Inuit
pp.:
298 – 303
B References
pp.:
321 – 329