Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. A Cochrane review

Author： van Wely Madelon Kwan Irene Burt Anna L. Thomas Jane Vail Andy Van der Veen Fulco Al-Inany Hesham G.

Publisher： Oxford University Press

ISSN： 1460-2369

Source： Human Reproduction Update, Vol.18, Iss.3, 2012-05, pp. : 340-340

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

By Vitthala S. Gelbaya T.A. Brison D.R. Fitzgerald C.T. Nardo L.G.

Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 2009-01 ,pp. : 45-55

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Efficacy of nafarelin in assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis

By Wong J.M.

Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 2001-02 ,pp. : 92-101

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective

By Connolly Mark P. Hoorens Stijn Chambers Georgina M.

Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 16, Iss. 6, 2010-04 ,pp. : 603-613

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cochrane review: post-operative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery

By Johnson N.P. Watson A.

Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, 2000-03 ,pp. : 259-267

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Anti-Mllerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART)

By La Marca A. Sighinolfi G. Radi D. Argento C. Baraldi E. Artenisio A. Carducci Stabile G. Volpe A.

Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, 2010-10 ,pp. : 113-130

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite