Author: Delplanque Sylvain Grandjean Didier Chrea Christelle Aymard Laurence Cayeux Isabelle Le Calv Bndicte Velazco Maria Ins Scherer Klaus R. Sander David
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1464-3553
Source: Chemical Senses, Vol.33, Iss.5, 2008-06, pp. : 469-479
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Pleasantness, familiarity, and intensity are 3 interdependent dimensions commonly used to describe the perceived qualities of an odor. In particular, many empirical studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between familiarity and pleasantness. However, on the basis of both theoretical and methodological perspectives, we questioned the validity of such a relation for malodors. We report 2 studies based on subjective judgments of a large sample of odorants (Experiment 1) associated with autonomic recordings (Experiment 2). Multivariate exploratory analysis performed on the data splits the whole odorant set into 2 subsets composed, respectively, of unpleasant and pleasant odorants. Subsequent correlation analyses have shown that the relation between pleasantness and familiarity is specific for the pleasant odors in the 2 experiments. Moreover, autonomic activity was more important in response to malodors than to pleasant odors and was significantly correlated with unpleasantness ratings in the subset of unpleasant odors. These 2 studies argue in favor of a functional dissociation in the relations between both subjective and autonomic responses to odors as a function of pleasantness and indicate that researchers in the olfactory domain should consider the relations between pleasantness and familiarity as more complex than linear.
Related content
Hemispheric Lateralization in the Processing of Odor Pleasantness versus Odor Names
By McCall C.
Chemical Senses, Vol. 24, Iss. 6, 1999-12 ,pp. :