

Author: Simpson Bob Humphrey Robin
Publisher: Berghahn Journals
ISSN: 1755-2273
Source: Learning and Teaching, Vol.3, Iss.1, 2010-03, pp. : 69-91
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In the training of doctoral researchers in the use of qualitative research methods, considerable effort goes into preparation for fieldwork and the collection of data. Rather less attention, however, goes into what happens when they have collected their data and begin to make sense of it. In particular, relatively little attention has been paid to the ways in which doctoral researchers might be supported as they begin to write using qualitative data. In this article we report on an inter-disciplinary project that set out to develop research training for qualitative researchers who had completed their fieldwork and were about to embark on writing their theses. An important issue in the delivery of this training was the question of boundaries – disciplinary, academic, technological and personal – and how these might be productively negotiated in the quest for good social science writing.
Related content


Reflections on the need for continued research on writing
By Miller Brett McCardle Peggy
Reading and Writing, Vol. 24, Iss. 2, 2011-02 ,pp. :


Writing a research paper: reflections on a reflective log
Educational Action Research, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 1999-06 ,pp. :




Doctoral students writing: where's the pedagogy?
Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 16, Iss. 4, 2011-08 ,pp. :


Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies
Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2004-04 ,pp. :