Enantiomeric Separation and Quantitation of (±)-Amphetamine, (±)-Methamphetamine, (±)-MDA, (±)-MDMA, and (±)-MDEA in Urine Specimens by GC–EI-MS after Derivatization with (R)-(–)- or (S)-(+)-α-Methoxy-α-(trifluoromethy)phenylacetyl Chloride

By Paul Buddha D.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 28, Iss. 6, 2004-09 ,pp. : 449-455

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Differences in Binding Affinities of MDA, MDMA, MDEA, Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, and their Deuterated Analogues to Solid-Phase Extraction Cartridges

By Romberg R.W.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. : 15-22

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs–Amphetamine Concentrations in Oral Fluid and Whole Blood Samples

By Engblom Charlotta   Gunnar Teemu   Rantanen Anna   Lillsunde Pirjo  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 31, Iss. 5, 2007-06 ,pp. : 276-280

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

TECHNICAL NOTE: Prevalence of Use Study for Amphetamine (AMP), Methamphetamine (MAMP), 3,4-Methylenedioxy-amphetamine (MDA), 3,4-Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-Methylenedioxy-ethylamphetamine (MDEA) in Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS) Specimens

By Klette Kevin L.   Kettle Aaron R.   Jamerson Matthew H.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 30, Iss. 5, 2006-06 ,pp. : 319-322

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rapid Analysis of Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, MDA, and MDMA in Urine Using Solid-Phase Microextraction, Direct On-Fiber Derivatization, and Analysis by GCâ–“MS

By Jurado C.   Giménez M.P.   Soriano T.   Menéndez M.   Repetto M.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 2000-01 ,pp. : 11-16

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite