Development and Validation of ELISA and GC-MS Procedures for the Quantification of Dextromethorphan and its Main Metabolite Dextrorphan in Urine and Oral Fluid

Author： Rodrigues Warren C.   Wang Guohong   Moore Christine   Agrawal Alpana   Vincent Michael J.   Soares James R.  

Publisher： Oxford University Press

ISSN： 0146-4760

Source： Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol.32, Iss.3, 2008-04, pp. : 220-226

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Screening of Clostebol and its Metabolites in Bovine Urine with ELISA and Comparison with GC-MS Results in an Interlaboratory Study

By Crabbe Patricia  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 27, Iss. 4, 2003-05 ,pp. : 213-220

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

GC/MS Assay of the Marijuana Carboxy Metabolite: Urine Interference With the Dimethyl Derivative

By Joern William A  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 1992-05 ,pp. : 207-207

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Development and GC–MS Validation of a Highly Sensitive Recombinant G6PDH-Based Homogeneous Immunoassay for the Detection of Buprenorphine and Norbuprenorphine in Urine

By Wang Guohong  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 31, Iss. 7, 2007-09 ,pp. : 377-382

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

TECHNICAL NOTE: Validation of the Immunalysis ® Microplate ELISA for the Detection of Buprenorphine and Its Metabolite Norbuprenorphine in Urine

By Miller Eleanor I.   Torrance Hazel J.   Oliver John S.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 30, Iss. 2, 2006-03 ,pp. : 115-119

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Evaluation of Buprenorphine CEDIA Assay versus GC–MS and ELISA using Urine Samples from Patients in Substitution Treatment

By Böttcher Michael  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 29, Iss. 8, 2005-11 ,pp. : 769-776

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite