On the Kim and Roush Voting Procedure

ISSN： 0926-2644

Source： Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol.8, Iss.2, 1999-03, pp. : 109-123

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Voting Paradoxes and MCDM

By Nurmi H.

Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, 2000-07 ,pp. : 297-313

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Contesting corporate control: shareholder voting

By Foley Maggie

International Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2013-08 ,pp. : 119-137

Inderscience Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

An enhanced approach to the ranked voting system

By Tamiz M. Foroughi A.A.

World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 3, Iss. 3-4, 2007-06 ,pp. : 365-372

Inderscience Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A risk assessment framework for electronic voting

By Bannister Frank Connolly Regina

International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 2007-07 ,pp. : 190-208

Inderscience Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Voting on Pensions with Endogenous Retirement Age

By Casamatta Georges

International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2005-01 ,pp. : 7-28

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite