On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk

Author： Gail Mitchell H. Pfeiffer Ruth M.

ISSN： 1465-4644

Source： Biostatistics, Vol.6, Iss.2, 2005-04, pp. : 227-239

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Extensions of criteria for evaluating risk prediction models for public health applications

By Pfeiffer Ruth M.

Biostatistics, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 2013-04 ,pp. : 366-381

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for inclusion of risk models for individualized prognosis in the practice of precision medicine

CA: A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, Vol. 66, Iss. 5, 2016-09 ,pp. : 370-374

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

REEVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATING SPERM MORPHOLOGY USING STRICT CRITERIA

By Check M. L. Bollendorf A. Check J. H. Katsoff D.

Archives of Andrology, Vol. 48, Iss. 1, 2002-01 ,pp. : 1-3

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

'Rigour', 'Ethical Integrity' or 'Artistry'? Reflexively Reviewing Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Research

By Finlay Linda

The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 69, Iss. 7, 2006-07 ,pp. : 319-326

College of Occupational Therapists

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

‘A Rose Is a Rose Is a Rose’, but At-Risk Criteria Differ

Psychopathology, Vol. 46, Iss. 2, 2012-08 ,pp. : 75-87

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite