

Author: Wüstner Kerstin
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1469-9915
Source: New Genetics & Society, Vol.26, Iss.1, 2007-04, pp. : 1-27
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) is one form of applied human genetics. In many countries this technological procedure is allowed and already practiced. In other, relatively rare cases, PGD is prohibited like in Germany or allowed only under very strict conditions like in Japan. Often, this technological application is controversially discussed because of its ethical and social implications (Meister et al., 2005). At the same time, in Germany a discussion has started on the legalization of PGD. In Japan, the discussion focuses on regulations and circumstances, under which couples are allowed to resort to PGD. The question is imminent, how people think about this new technology and how different factors like values, nationality, family status, sex and age affect their attitudes towards PGD. Therefore, a comparative survey was conducted among German and Japanese students. The analysis of the two samples shows how young people, most of whom will be confronted with questions of family planning, assess different aspects of PGD and what main factors their judgement is based on.
Related content


Issues in pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
New Genetics & Society, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 2001-04 ,pp. :




Attitudes towards genetic engineering
New Genetics & Society, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2000-12 ,pp. :

