The Use of Double Anonymity in Peer Review: A Decision Whose Time Has Come?

ISSN： 1521-0677

Source： Quality Assurance: Good Practice, Regulation, and Law, Vol.11, Iss.2-4, 2005-04, pp. : 103-109

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Peer Review as a QA Tool in Environmental Applications

By Brilis George Lyon John

Quality Assurance: Good Practice, Regulation, and Law, Vol. 11, Iss. 2-4, 2005-04 ,pp. : 111-129

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Time-Use Studies

By Bryson Valerie

International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, 2008-06 ,pp. : 135-153

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Double-Devolution or Double-Dealing? The Local Government White Paper and the Lyons Review

By Davies Jonathan

Local Government Studies, Vol. 34, Iss. 1, 2008-02 ,pp. : 3-22

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Book Review: Business Decision Making in China

By Bjerke B.V.

Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, 1999-04 ,pp. : 176-177

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Factors Affecting Internationalization Decision Making in Family Businesses: An Integrated Literature Review

The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 2014-04 ,pp. : 53-77

GSE Research

Access to resources Recommend Favorite