

Author: Jenkins Richard
Publisher: Imprint Academic
ISSN: 1611-8812
Source: Mind and Matter, Vol.10, Iss.2, 2012-01, pp. : 149-168
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Without wishing to deny the historical reality of processes of disenchantment, this paper challenges the classic Weberian account of disenchantment as a uni-directional and universalizing tendency of modernity. This argument has a number of stages. (1) Reason and rationalization are distinguished from each other. (2) The historical relationships between modernity, Reason and rationalization are problematized. (3) The scale and scope of rationalization are questioned (it is partial and unsuccessful, almost by definition). (4) Secularization and the 'decline of magic' are distinguished from each other. (5) Enchantment and re-enchantment are placed at the heart of modernity. Enchantment and re-enchantment are both distinctively modern and a response to modernity. While disenchantment has been a stimulus to (re)enchantment, enchantment may generate its own disenchantments. The two are opposite sides of one coin. This argument is exemplified by a brief look at the contradictions, alarms and damp squibs of the recent Millennium.
Related content


Return Trip: The Re-Enchantment of Psychedelics
By Davis Erik
Mind and Matter, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, 2012-01 ,pp. :




The importance of being benched: soccer, contingency and re-enchantment
By Frank Søren
Soccer and Society, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, 2013-01 ,pp. :


Max Weber As an Opposite of Tolstoy
Social Sciences, Vol. 45, Iss. 4, 2014-12 ,pp. :


Zum Staatsverstndnis bei Max Weber
Sociologia Internationalis, Vol. 52, Iss. 1, 2014-06 ,pp. :