Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization

Author： Samuelson Paul A.  

Publisher： American Economic Association

ISSN： 0895-3309

Source： The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.18, Iss.3, 2004-08, pp. : 135-146

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Why Mainstream Economists Should Take Heed

By Madrick Jeff  

Feminist Economics, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 1997-03 ,pp. : 143-149

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why John Stuart Mill should not be enlisted among neoclassical economists

By Sotiropoulos Dimitris  

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2009-09 ,pp. : 455-473

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Spitalfields Acts and the classics: Ricardo, J.S. Mill, Bowring, and Senior on the London silk industry (1823 to 1841)

By Hupfel Simon  

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 2012-04 ,pp. : 165-195

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Financial literacy education

By  

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, Vol. 39, Iss. 2, 2015-03 ,pp. : 155-161

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Does Mill's case for infant industry protection capture Hamilton's and List's arguments for promoting industrial development?

By Ho P. Sai-Wing  

Review of Political Economy, Vol. 25, Iss. 4, 2013-10 ,pp. : 546-571

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite