

Author: Olasky Jaisa Moazzez Ashkan Barrera Kaylene Clarke Tatyan Shriki Jabi Sohn Helen J. Katkhouda Namir Mason Rodney J.
Publisher: Southeastern Surgical Congress
ISSN: 0003-1348
Source: The American Surgeon, Vol.75, Iss.10, 2009-10, pp. : 958-961
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In contrast to adult colonic intussusception in which malignancy is the dominant cause, small bowel intussusceptions are mostly benign. Although surgery is the accepted standard treatment, its necessity in small bowel intussusceptions identified by CT scan is unknown. Twenty-three patients from 2005 to 2008 (16 males; median age, 44 years) with acute abdominal pain and CT-proven small bowel intussusception were studied. Factors associated with the necessity for surgery were determined. Among 11 patients who were managed operatively, surgery was deemed unnecessary in two patients based on negative explorations. Follow up in 10 of 12 patients managed nonoperatively was not associated with any recurrence of intussusception or malignancy (median follow up, 14 months). The only predictor of the need for surgery was CT evidence of small bowel obstruction and/or a radiologically identified lead point, which was present in 7 of 9 (78%) patients having a necessary operation and absent in 12 of 14 (86%) with no indication for surgery (
Related content




The role of routine assays of serum amylase and lipase for the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain
By Sutton Paul A Humes David J Purcell Gemma Smith Janette K Whiting Frances Wright Tom Morgan Linda Lobo Dileep N
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol. 91, Iss. 5, 2009-07 ,pp. :




By Hasselager Rune Gögenur Ismail
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, Vol. 399, Iss. 3, 2014-03 ,pp. :