

Author: Roesner Larry A. Rohrer Christine A.
Publisher: Water Environment Federation
ISSN: 1938-6478
Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol.2006, Iss.9, 2006-01, pp. : 3736-3743
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The design of urban runoff management facilities generally includes peak shaving for flood control, and best management practices (BMPs) for removing pollutants from the runoff. A number of scientists have concluded that the combination of these two control practices, which were developed independently of one another, is not sufficient to protect aquatic ecosystems. But these conclusions have focused solely on the bioassessment of urban streams without taking into account the design criteria used for peak flow reduction facilities and for BMPs. Previous studies at the Colorado State University Urban Water Center (CSU), have demonstrated that if the design storms for peak flow control are properly chosen and used in conjunction with the properly sized volumetric BMPs, it is possible to preserve the predevelopment peak-flow frequency curve and to minimize geomorphic instability in an urbanizing watershed.Current research at CSU is now focusing on the development of a protocol for data collection along urban gradients combined with mathematical modeling to determine the ecologic impacts of urban runoff resulting from different land use patterns and/or implementation of alternative runoff management technologies. This study builds upon a previous study conducted for the Water Environment Research Foundation on the
Related content










Land Use and Runoff Uncertainty
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2009, Iss. 11, 2009-01 ,pp. :