Determining Dangerousness: Whatever Happened to the Rules of Evidence?

ISSN： 1321-8719

Source： Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol.10, Iss.1, 2003-08, pp. : 122-139

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

multiple sclerosis, stress and the rules of evidence

PRACTICAL NEUROLOGY, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2004-04 ,pp. : 66-69

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Prediction of Violence; Detection of Dangerousness

By Norko Michael A. Baranoski Madelon V.

Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2008-02 ,pp. : 73-91

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cerebellum and Cognition: Evidence for the Encoding of Higher Order Rules

By Balsters Joshua H. Whelan Christopher D. Robertson Ian H. Ramnani Narender

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 23, Iss. 6, 2013-06 ,pp. : 1433-1443

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Brain waves, dangerousness and deviant desires

By Howard R.C.

Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2002-09 ,pp. : 367-384

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Negotiating "Dangerousness": Charting a Course Between Psychiatry and Law

By Yannoulidis Steven T.

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2002-05 ,pp. : 151-162

Australian Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite