

Author: Giffard P.M. McMahon J.A. Gustafson H.M. Barnard R.T. Voisey J.
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0003-2697
Source: Analytical Biochemistry, Vol.292, Iss.2, 2001-05, pp. : 207-215
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
A simulation of competitively primed allele-specific DNA amplification has been constructed and its behavior examined. This has shown that when the ratio of the amount of homoduplex misprime product to the total amount of amplimer is low, it increases by approximately one-fourth of the mispriming frequency with each doubling of the total amount of amplimer. When the ratio is high and reverse mispriming becomes significant, it asymptotes toward a value <0.5. An analogous simulation was carried out on conventional allele-specific DNA amplification. As expected, the ratio of the amount of amplimer in the positive and negative reactions closely approximates the mispriming frequency provided that amplification is exponential in both cases. This suggests that conventional allele-specific amplification has somewhat higher inherent specificity than competitively primed amplification. However, conventional allele-specific reactions are subject to a “catch-up” phase in which the positive reaction slows or stops, thus reducing the specificity. It was hypothesized that competitively primed reactions may be easier to optimize than conventional allele-specific reactions. This conjecture was supported experimentally. In addition, it was shown that the specificity of competitively primed reactions is a function of the degree of amplification.
Related content




Dynamic allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization on solid support
Analytical Biochemistry, Vol. 324, Iss. 2, 2004-01 ,pp. :




Allele-Specific Suppression as a Tool to Study Protein–Protein Interactions in Bacteria
By Manson M.D.
Methods, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 2000-01 ,pp. :


Allele-specific analysis of transcription factors binding to promoter regions
Methods, Vol. 26, Iss. 1, 2002-01 ,pp. :