Thermodynamic Properties of an Intramolecular DNA Four-Way Junction

Author: Makube N.   Klump H.   Pikkemaat J.   Altona C.  

Publisher: Elsevier

ISSN: 0003-9861

Source: Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Vol.364, Iss.1, 1999-04, pp. : 53-60

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

We have investigated the thermodynamic properties of two homologous DNA four-way junctions, J4 and J4M, based on 46-mer linear DNA molecules. J4 and J4M have the same base sequence with the only difference that the latter contains an uncharged methylene–acetal linkage, -O3′-CH2-O5′, instead of the phosphodiester linkage, -O3′-PO2-O5′-, between the residues T18 and C19. The comparison of the thermal unfolding of the J4 junction and J4M junction serves to investigate the effect of the uncharged methylene–acetal linkage on the stability of the junction. Our analysis is based on CD, UV absorbance spectroscopy, DSC, and chemical footprinting. The aim is to characterize in detail the structure and stability of the junctions. As demonstrated before by NMR, in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 ± 50 mM NaCl, both J4 and J4M form a complete four-way junction. This is now evidenced by protection from OsO4 cleavage (chemical footprinting). We can assume that full base pairing occurs throughout the arms even at the center of the junction. CD spectra suggest that the helices within the junctions adopt the regular B-DNA conformation. Almost identical melting temperatures and unfolding enthalpies are obtained for J4 and J4M both by UV and DSC. Furthermore, the Van't Hoff enthalpy (ΔHVH) derived from UV melting equals the calorimetric enthalpy (ΔHcal), which means that the melting process of the structures proceeds in a two-state manner. All results taken together support the conclusion that there are no major conformational and energetic differences between J4 and J4M. The inclusion of the uncharged methylene–acetal group into the junction has no effect on its stability.