Specified Principlism: What is it, and Does it Really Resolve Cases Better than Casuistry?

ISSN： 0360-5310

Source： The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol.25, Iss.3, 2000-06, pp. : 323-341

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry

By Smith Iltis Ana

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, 2000-06 ,pp. : 271-284

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to Strong on Principlism and Casuistry

By Beauchamp Tom L.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, 2000-06 ,pp. : 342-347

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Casuistry and Principlism: The Convergence of Method in Biomedical Ethics

By Kuczewski M.

Theoretical Medicine, Vol. 19, Iss. 6, 1998-12 ,pp. : 509-524

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Common Morality versus Specified Principlism: Reply to Richardson

By Gert Bernard Culver Charles M. Clouser K. Danner

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, 2000-06 ,pp. : 308-322

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Collaboration: what does it really mean to nurses?

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Vol. 24, Iss. 13-14, 2015-07 ,pp. : 2052-2054

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite