

Author: Brooks Matthew Swann William Mehta Pranjal
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1529-8868
Source: Self and Identity, Vol.10, Iss.1, 2011-01, pp. : 77-84
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that when people receive self-discrepant feedback from their interaction partners, they respond by engaging in compensatory self-verification. We sought to extend this work by determining if merely preventing people from behaving in a self-verifying manner would trigger compensatory self-verification. Consistent with this possibility, when deprived of the opportunity to demonstrate their assertiveness, participants who perceived themselves as assertive subsequently compensated by displaying increased assertiveness in a subsequent interaction. In addition, self-perceived unassertive participants reported negative affect when forced to act in an assertive manner. Evidence that these effects were predicted by a measure of identity but not a measure of behavioral propensity diminished the plausibility of rival accounts such as ego depletion. We conclude that compensatory self-verification emerges even when people's self-views are indirectly challenged by depriving them of the opportunity to self-verify.
Related content




Self-verification 360°: Illuminating the Light and Dark Sides
By North Rebecca Swann William
Self and Identity, Vol. 8, Iss. 2-3, 2009-04 ,pp. :


自我提升还是自我验证:产生条件及影响 Self-Enhance or Self-Verification: The Conditions of Motivation and Effect
Advances in Psychology, Vol. 03, Iss. 01, 2013-01 ,pp. :

