Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “What is The Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research?”

Author： van der Graaf Rieke   van Delden Johannes JM  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1536-0075

Source： American Journal of Bioethics, Vol.9, Iss.6-7, 2009-06, pp. : 7-8

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

What is the Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research?

By van der Graaf Rieke   van Delden Johannes  

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, 2009-03 ,pp. : 35-43

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials”

By Edwards Sarah  

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2011-04 ,pp. : 1-3

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Duty to Deceive: Placebos in Clinical Practice”

By Foddy Bennett  

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 9, Iss. 12, 2009-12 ,pp. : 1-2

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”

By Cho Mildred   Tobin Sara   Greely Henry   McCormick Jennifer   Boyce Angie   Magnus David  

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 8, Iss. 3, 2008-03 ,pp. : 4-6

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Bioethical Considerations in Translational Research: Primate Stroke”

By Sughrue Michael   Mocco J.   Mack Willam   Ducruet Andrew   Komotar Ricardo   Fischbach Ruth   Martin Thomas   Connolly E. Sander  

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 9, Iss. 5, 2009-05 ,pp. : 1-3

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite