A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions

By Kaminsky Leonard A   Ozemek Cemal  

Physiological Measurement, Vol. 33, Iss. 11, 2012-11 ,pp. : 1869-1876

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults

By Abel Mark G.   Hannon James C.   Sell Katie   Lillie Tia   Conlin Geri   Anderson David  

Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, Vol. 33, Iss. 6, 2008-12 ,pp. : 1155-1164

NRC Research Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions

By Lee Ka-Yiu   Macfarlane Duncan J.   Cerin Ester  

European Journal of Sport Science, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 2013-05 ,pp. : 332-339

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors in persons with multiple sclerosis and controls

By Sandroff Brian M.   Motl Robert W.  

Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 35, Iss. 9, 2013-05 ,pp. : 725-731

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Biomechanical examination of the ‘plateau phenomenon’ in ActiGraph vertical activity counts

By John Dinesh   Miller Ross   Kozey-Keadle Sarah   Caldwell Graham   Freedson Patty  

Physiological Measurement, Vol. 33, Iss. 2, 2012-02 ,pp. : 219-230

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite