Reply to the Letter by T. Nijsten et al.

Author： Mazzotti Eva Barbaranelli Claudio Picardi Angelo Abeni Damiano Pasquini Paolo

ISSN： 0001-5555

Source： Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Vol.86, Iss.3, 2006-05, pp. : 290-291

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Reply to the Letter by Langan & Rhodes

By Thestrup-Pedersen Kristian

Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Vol. 91, Iss. 3, 2011-05 ,pp. : 377-378

Medical Journals Limited

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to Letter by Rupa & Monk

By Lowe Nicholas

Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2003-01 ,pp. : 54-54

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

In Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Ramam & Srivastava

By Labandeira Javier Toribio Jaime

Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Vol. 84, Iss. 4, 2004-07 ,pp. : 335-336

Medical Journals Limited

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comment on Zhao et al. “Palmoplantar Keratoderma of the Gamborg-Nielsen Type is Caused by Mutations in the SLURP1 Gene and Represents a Variant of Mal de Meleda” Reply to Nellen et al's Comment on the Classification of Clinical/genetic Variants of Mal de Meleda

Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Vol. 95, Iss. 8, 2015-11 ,pp. : 1034-1035

Medical Journals Limited

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Economic evaluations based on decision models: A response to Muston et al.

By Wilson Ed

Journal of Dermatological Treatment, Vol. 22, Iss. 5, 2011-10 ,pp. : 298-301

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite