Author: Andersen Heine
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
ISSN: 0022-0418
Source: Journal of Documentation, Vol.56, Iss.6, 2000-11, pp. : 674-692
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The existence of hierarchies based on reputation in modern science is indisputable. A set of common scientific journals is often assumed to be instrumental in the formation of these hierarchies. However, the character of the hierarchies, how monolithic/pluralistic they are and the functions of this differentiation have been discussed and caused controversy. The article brings together results from a survey of 788 Danish researchers, mainly from the social sciences, concerning their assessments of the most influential researchers and most important journals. The rankings indicate a pluralistic picture and only a moderate degree of consensus among researchers. Comparisons with (the few) other surveys and with citation data do not suggest this to be a peculiarity of Danish social scientists, however.
Related content
Expensing e-books: how much should patron habit influence collection development?
By CottrellTerrance LutherAcademic Technology and Library Services University of St. Francis Joliet Illinois USA BellBrigitteLibrary University of St. Francis Joliet Illinois USA
The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, Vol. 27, Iss. 4, 2014-11 ,pp. :
How much law should librarians know?
New Library World, Vol. 103, Iss. 10, 2002-11 ,pp. :