

Author: Villar R Hughson R L
Publisher: IOP Publishing
ISSN: 0967-3334
Source: Physiological Measurement, Vol.34, Iss.3, 2013-03, pp. : 291-306
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
We tested the data repeatability for popliteal blood flow velocity (PBV), popliteal arterial diameter (ADpop), popliteal blood flow (PBF) and lower limb vascular conductance (VC) at rest and exercise in three body positions, two work rates and two inspired oxygen fractions. Fifteen, eleven and ten healthy volunteers participated in the three phases of the studies. Resting protocols were performed in horizontal (HOR), 35° head-down tilt (HDT) and 45° head-up tilt (HUT) for 5 min in each body position. Participants also exercised at lower and higher power outputs (repeated plantar flexion contractions at 20% and 30% maximal voluntary contraction, respectively) in HOR, HDT and HUT and in normoxia (21%O2) and hypoxia (14%O2) with the same work rates and body positions. PBV and ADpop were measured by ultrasound to determine PBF, and VC was estimated by dividing PBF by muscle perfusion pressure (MPP). PBV, ADpop, PBF and VC were not different, demonstrated good agreement and consistency between the two days of testing during both rest and exercise conditions regardless of body position. Therefore, these data support the utilization of Doppler and echo Doppler ultrasound as a reproducible method to measure PBV and ADpop and consequently estimate PBF and VC responses in such conditions.
Related content










ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol. 46, Iss. S1, 2015-09 ,pp. :