

Author: Munson J. Michael Spivey W. Austin
Publisher: Industrial Research Institute, Inc
ISSN: 0895-6308
Source: Research-Technology Management, Vol.49, Iss.4, 2006-07, pp. : 39-45
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) continue to be an important means of transferring technology. By incorporating the perspective of portfolio management, technology managers can use CRADAs to add value to their new product development process at any stage. Analysis of 124 alliances from a U.S. government facility known as a center of excellence for its R&D highlights the advantages of managing CRADAs by using a two-dimensional taxonomy: including both the type of agreement (constellation, exchange, process), and the stage in the technology life cycle (pre-versus post-dominant design). The portfolio should reflect the enterprise's strategic approach for achieving sustainable competitive advantage and creating customer value. Successful enterprises will remain mindful of the emergence of a dominant design and think broadly about portfolio structure. Long-term success will result from continual innovation that adds value to the network of relationships among competitors, vendors and customers.
Related content


Innovation Portfolio Architecture
Research-Technology Management, Vol. 53, Iss. 6, 2010-11 ,pp. :


Managing the relationship portfolio
By Eilles Alan Bartels Matt Brunsman Barry
Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 24, Iss. 4, 2003-06 ,pp. :


The portfolio career: pushed or pulled to it?
By Mallon Mary
Personnel Review, Vol. 27, Iss. 5, 1998-05 ,pp. :


Managing IT as a Portfolio of Services
By Peppard J.
European Management Journal, Vol. 21, Iss. 4, 2003-08 ,pp. :


Managing the Opportunity Portfolio
By Terwiesch Christian Ulrich Karl
Research-Technology Management, Vol. 51, Iss. 5, 2008-09 ,pp. :