Author： Torrey William Rapp Charles Van Tosh Laura McNabb Charity Ralph Ruth
Publisher： Springer Publishing Company
ISSN： 0010-3853
Source： Community Mental Health Journal, Vol.41, Iss.1, 2005-02, pp. : 91-100
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The two of the most commonly advocated service improvement proposals for adults with severe mental illnesses are to redesign services based on recovery principles and to increase the availability of services with strong research support. The two improvement strategies complement and inform each other much more than they conflict. To improve, the field needs the insights of people who have personally experienced severe mental illnesses and it needs the scientific process. Applied together, the two strategies can guide the development of an optimal service system: The kind of service system that most people would want for themselves or their family should they have the need.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
ESSAYS The Rhetoric of Evidence-Based Practice
By Newnes Craig
Ethical Human Sciences and Services, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2002-01 ,pp. :