A comparison between CESMM3 and MCHW as methods of measurement for civil engineering work

Author： Eadie Robert   Millar Phillip   Harte Nigel  

Publisher： Inderscience Publishers

ISSN： 1753-8432

Source： International Journal of Procurement Management, Vol.6, Iss.5, 2013-08, pp. : 523-543

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The influence of selection factors on evolutionary change methods: A case in the civil engineering industry

By Friedl Peter   Biloslavo Roberto  

Management Decision, Vol. 47, Iss. 5, 2009-05 ,pp. : 681-701

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The distinction between work pace and working hours in the measurement of quantitative demands at work

By Kristensen Tage S.   Bjorner Jakob B.   Christensen Karl B.   Borg Vilhelm  

Work & Stress, Vol. 18, Iss. 4, 2004-10 ,pp. : 305-322

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Performance measurement: the comparison between a process and a model approach

By Bititci Umit   Turner Trevor   Bourne Mike  

International Journal of Business Performance Management, Vol. 3, Iss. 2-4, 2003-07 ,pp. : 135-153

Inderscience Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Empowerment in work and welfare: a comparison between employment issues and human services practices

By Neher Joanne C   Natale Samuel M  

Empowerment in Organisations, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 1997-01 ,pp. : 26-32

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Leadership and followers' work goals: a comparison between Japan and the UK

By Fukushige Aya   Spicer David P.  

International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22, Iss. 10, 2011-06 ,pp. : 2110-2134

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite