Talking at cross-purposes: how Einstein and the logical empiricists never agreed on what they were disagreeing about

ISSN： 0039-7857

Source： Synthese, Vol.190, Iss.17, 2013-11, pp. : 3819-3863

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Disagreeing about how to disagree

By Manne Kate Sobel David

Philosophical Studies, Vol. 168, Iss. 3, 2014-04 ,pp. : 823-834

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Forgotten Tradition: How the Logical Empiricists Missed the Philosophical Significance of the Work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci

By Giovanelli Marco

Erkenntnis, Vol. 78, Iss. 6, 2013-12 ,pp. : 1219-1257

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation

By Godden D.M.

Argumentation, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 2003-01 ,pp. : 219-243

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

(STILL) DISAGREEING ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE: WHICH WAY FORWARD?

ZYGON, Vol. 50, Iss. 4, 2015-12 ,pp. : 893-905

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Talking About a Universalist World

By Braddon-Mitchell David Miller Kristie

Philosophical Studies, Vol. 130, Iss. 3, 2006-09 ,pp. : 499-534

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite