

Author: Kletter Hilit Rialon Rebecca Laor Nathaniel Brom Daniel Pat-Horenczyk Ruth Shaheen Mohammed Hamiel Daniel Chemtob Claude Weems Carl Feinstein Carl Lieberman Alicia Reicherter Daryn Song Suzan Carrion Victor
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 1053-1890
Source: Child and Youth Care Forum, Vol.42, Iss.4, 2013-08, pp. : 371-388
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper outlines conclusions from a three-day workgroup hosting the eight authors as well as others with expertise in the evaluation and treatment of youth exposed to war and violence.The purpose of this meeting was to bring multiple perspectives together to identify components that comprise effective psychosocial interventions for child victims of war and community violence across cultures. The meeting also sought to identify gaps in the existing treatment approaches.In the meeting, personal experiences and previous research were discussed to develop a wide-ranging intervention approach, determine a cohesive definition for “indirect” exposure, and identify successful methods of intervention delivery for youth exposed to acts of war and violence.Key components of intervention for youth exposed to war/violence, important outcome measures, and cultural differences that may influence effective intervention were identified. A clearer definition of “indirect” exposure was also developed. Finally, a nine-phase model was developed to provide guidelines for establishing partnerships between trauma teams and other organizations or schools to implement and disseminate treatment for this population.
Related content




Social Work with Children and Families
British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, 2013-03 ,pp. :



